OK, in the interest of full disclosure, the Yankees didn't sign Jesus to a minor league contract, because everyone knows the son of god would be starting over Johnny Damon. However, they have now signed AJ Burnett, CC Sabathia and most recently, Mark Teixeira, easily giving them a lock on coolest named players in baseball. They were easily able to purchase the soul of Sabathia after outbidding themselves. When he stalled at their offer, which was FORTY MILLION more than any other team out there (because he wanted to stay with the Brewers and his shorter identical twin Prince Fielder and mash homeruns while eating bratwurst), the Yanks topped it by another 20 million.
Apart from the Yankees having a long history of luring players away from teams and making them completely unlikeable* (A-Rod, Damon, Giambi, Xavier Nady and now these 3), they've committed $420 million to these three, which is approximately 10 times the GDP of Ecuador if I did my research correctly. That's a lot of money. Sure, the good ol' Yanks have a long history of overspending on free agents, most of them crappy, which backfires to my delight. But now, with the new stadium being built (and behind schedule) they have one hand reaching into taxpayers pockets, while the other hand immediately throws that money to high priced players.
The Thug-brenners, long time owners of the Yankees, have for years threatened to move the team if they didn't get a new stadium, which, after 25 years of crying, led to the city forking over $941 million in tax-exempt bonds. The Yankees were allowed to raze public parkland without a real plan on replacing it (Bloomberg gets to call himself the environmental mayor and have a million trees initiative while his Parks Department doesn't even count, let alone inventory, the trees they started destroying before they were even allowed to) and when they do, most likely it will be on top of an underground parking garage with harmful rubber turfing.
The Yankees and their cronies were able to pressure land surveyors into coming up with a small appraisal for the land so not much would need to be replaced while telling the IRS it was worth 10 times the amount, at $200 million, so they could get P.I.L.O.T.s, or Payments In Lieu Of Taxes. However, the Yankees don't actually pay property taxes, so what these are in lieu of is really anyone's guess. Our mayor and city council are coddling rich assholes who want to save millions of dollars, so they can spend millions of dollars on things like larger scoreboards and nicer furnishings in luxury box offices while raising ticket prices to the very people whose money they are spending on these needless things. Now they're asking for 350 million more. The city doesn't make nearly as much back from public financing of new stadiums as they should, as much fewer new permanent jobs are created than advertised, the city gets stuck paying for a new Metro North station to accomodate overflow, and the Yankees** charge sales tax on tickets to pay back the tax-exempt bonds and not actually pay the taxes. Like so many before him to Wal-Mart and all those other big box retail bullies, New York's "illustrious" mayor has caved and screwed the people of this city.
*The Mets only lure players away and then they become awful. Yea, I'm looking at you Bonilla and Carlos Baerga.
**While this article is only about the Yankees because they're greedier and I'm a Mets fan, I don't believe CitiField, with 10,000 fewer seats and the power to displace many hard working people, needed to be built and definitely not with public money. Public money should be spent on things for the public, not private projects.
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Sunday, December 21, 2008
This Dating Life 3
So I had another date, and this one went pretty well. She was attractive, didn't dress like a lumberjack and at least faked a reach for her purse when the check came. Sure, she didn't use many words correctly and couldn't understand how freelancing worked, but I'm not that picky. It seemed we both had a good time, and I was expecting a 2nd date. The 2nd date never materialized, however, and I was told her gut didn't think we were a good match. I wonder if it had anything to do with me loving the Muppets and her, to this day, cowering in fear whenever anyone mentions The Count. One, one date that we went on. Two, two dates we'll never go on.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Double Your Action
Have you ever opened a container of strawberries, or any other kind of fruit, to find one attached to another and you'd think to yourself "wow, a double strawberry! What did I do to deserve such awesomeness?" Well, this is like that, except you'll be getting two movie reviews in one blog, instead of two strawberries.
I recently saw hit action movies Wanted and Hancock, which share almost nothing in common except both made me say "Hell yea, Will Smith" and both jumped the shark in the middle. The Loom of Fate? Really? You couldn't come up with a better plot device than to make some sort of loom that controls the actions of people throughout history, causing a society of assassins to be formed and then, later, to be killed by Angelina's ridiculously curvy...bullet? Was the Toaster of Destiny already taken? The Typewriter of Truth too expensive to get? I had been enjoying the absolute ridiculousness of the movie, the wanton violence and crazy special effects, the whole time wondering how much of Angelina they'd show, when, BOOM. I now have to think about a fucking textile making machine as the power behind the story, and that ruined it for me. It makes me sick to think I once wanted to curve my bullets too.
As for Hancock, I'm perfectly enjoying myself, watching a drunk, inconsiderate superhero and his always funny PR man, Jason Bateman, try to change the public's perception of him, when out of nowhere, Charlize Theron is also a superhero. But things aren't what they seem to be, for these are gods or angels that were apparently created for no purpose other than to ruin what had been a good movie.
I recently saw hit action movies Wanted and Hancock, which share almost nothing in common except both made me say "Hell yea, Will Smith" and both jumped the shark in the middle. The Loom of Fate? Really? You couldn't come up with a better plot device than to make some sort of loom that controls the actions of people throughout history, causing a society of assassins to be formed and then, later, to be killed by Angelina's ridiculously curvy...bullet? Was the Toaster of Destiny already taken? The Typewriter of Truth too expensive to get? I had been enjoying the absolute ridiculousness of the movie, the wanton violence and crazy special effects, the whole time wondering how much of Angelina they'd show, when, BOOM. I now have to think about a fucking textile making machine as the power behind the story, and that ruined it for me. It makes me sick to think I once wanted to curve my bullets too.
As for Hancock, I'm perfectly enjoying myself, watching a drunk, inconsiderate superhero and his always funny PR man, Jason Bateman, try to change the public's perception of him, when out of nowhere, Charlize Theron is also a superhero. But things aren't what they seem to be, for these are gods or angels that were apparently created for no purpose other than to ruin what had been a good movie.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Shea Seats
Oh my goodness oh my goodness oh my goodness. OH MY GOODNESS!! My Shea Stadium seats just arrived in the mail today and I am golly gee excited!! I've been waiting for these since I was about 10 years old (about 17.5 years ago). For just 950 dollars or so, I got two orange seats from the Field Level section, nailed to plywood and weighing in at 95 lbs., delivered to me TODAY. I am giddy! There's hardware to attach wooden legs so you can sit on them (the other sections would have needed to be bolted to the floor, so good thing I chose field instead of upper deck), but I can't get the seats out of the box yet. A friend joked I don't need to go to the gym, I can just lift the seats, but actually, I need to go to the gym before I can lift the seats. What I failed to take into account when I bought 2 seats from Shea Stadium was that the 2 seats have been at Shea Stadium for 28 years. That's a lot of spilled beers, sick fans and empty peanut shells that nobody cleaned up before shipping the seats.
Later that day...
After going through a number of socket wrenches and much anguish, I finally found a wrench lying right next to the seats that removed the bolts from the plywood and found I was able to lift the seats with ease. Either my mutation of super strength finally activated, or the plywood was keeping the seats grounded.
Later that day...
After going through a number of socket wrenches and much anguish, I finally found a wrench lying right next to the seats that removed the bolts from the plywood and found I was able to lift the seats with ease. Either my mutation of super strength finally activated, or the plywood was keeping the seats grounded.
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Things And Linens 'N Things
Recently, Linens N Things started having going out of business sales, but real ones, not the fake ones designed to lure in tourists in Times Square or Chinatown, or Russians in my neighborhood, where the store actually outlives everyone on Earth. This was most likely due to no one agreeing on whether the apostrophe came before or after "N."
Writing about the automotive industry and it's bailout got me thinking. Why is it OK for stores like Linens 'n Things and other big box retailers to go out of business, but if a car company does, it will take down the entire economy? Would an enterprising soul rise up and form a new shitty bed and bath store to fill the niche? Would Bed Bath & Beyond finally feel secure in it's market share, or would it expand? If neither happened, what would become of all the extra inventory?
The manufacturers wouldn't create stores, because for the most part, manufacturers don't want to interact directly with consumers, probably because most consumers are annoying and bring kids into stores who smear chocolate and whatever else happens to be in their hands/mouths all over the place. My guess is another department store would emerge, or maybe Sir Richard Branson will decide to scrap space tourism in favor of expanding the Virgin brand to include 400 thread count sheets and soap dishes.
Much of this is due to the rise of the department store, a one-stop-shop-and-drop for the lazy American inside all of us. Sure, the first department store can be attributed to Ireland in the 1830s, and Sears Roebuck and Macy's were rugged and glamorous in the late 19th/early 20th century, solidifying the department store in society. But now, led by Walmart and strip malls, department stores are aiming to take over the nation, bastardizing local culture in an increased homogenization and globalization designed to destroy individuality. Gone are local quirks and styles, replaced forever by cheesiness and the same landscape.
***
In other economic news (suck it Suze Orman!! Wait, no, don't.) the deflation that everyone is worried about isn't coming soon enough. Over the summer, when oil prices were sky high, wheat went up too. Now that oil has fallen dramatically, I assumed pizza would be normal price again. But wait a minute, that's not how economics works at all! Why drop the price of a shitty slice of cheese pizza to a buck fifty when you can continue to charge two twenty-five and claim cows are an endangered species or this is the last shipment of tomato sauce until the middle of 2009?
Writing about the automotive industry and it's bailout got me thinking. Why is it OK for stores like Linens 'n Things and other big box retailers to go out of business, but if a car company does, it will take down the entire economy? Would an enterprising soul rise up and form a new shitty bed and bath store to fill the niche? Would Bed Bath & Beyond finally feel secure in it's market share, or would it expand? If neither happened, what would become of all the extra inventory?
The manufacturers wouldn't create stores, because for the most part, manufacturers don't want to interact directly with consumers, probably because most consumers are annoying and bring kids into stores who smear chocolate and whatever else happens to be in their hands/mouths all over the place. My guess is another department store would emerge, or maybe Sir Richard Branson will decide to scrap space tourism in favor of expanding the Virgin brand to include 400 thread count sheets and soap dishes.
Much of this is due to the rise of the department store, a one-stop-shop-and-drop for the lazy American inside all of us. Sure, the first department store can be attributed to Ireland in the 1830s, and Sears Roebuck and Macy's were rugged and glamorous in the late 19th/early 20th century, solidifying the department store in society. But now, led by Walmart and strip malls, department stores are aiming to take over the nation, bastardizing local culture in an increased homogenization and globalization designed to destroy individuality. Gone are local quirks and styles, replaced forever by cheesiness and the same landscape.
***
In other economic news (suck it Suze Orman!! Wait, no, don't.) the deflation that everyone is worried about isn't coming soon enough. Over the summer, when oil prices were sky high, wheat went up too. Now that oil has fallen dramatically, I assumed pizza would be normal price again. But wait a minute, that's not how economics works at all! Why drop the price of a shitty slice of cheese pizza to a buck fifty when you can continue to charge two twenty-five and claim cows are an endangered species or this is the last shipment of tomato sauce until the middle of 2009?
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Where Do I Sign Up For My $15 Billion?
It's easy for most people to write about what they know, because they can come off as an expert on the field, and others will listen and feel enriched by their knowledge. That's what this blog has mostly been about for the past 3 years, from bears to movie reviews to deciphering all the complicated technical things Human Dynamo does. Well, it's time I take the plunge, and write about something I don't know much about at all: economics. Specifically, the car industy's proposed bailout. (SPOILER ALERT: For a much better and more factual and intelligent argument, check out Human Dynamo's "Car Talk." But keep reading this first.)
A couple of weeks ago, Yahoo reported the following: "General Motors Corp. said Friday it lost $2.5 billion in the third quarter and warned that it could run out of cash in 2009 if the U.S. economic slump continues and it doesn't get government aid." Aww, GM needs more money from the government so they can make more cars that nobody can afford, or so they can buy another company so they have more of a stranglehold on the car industry. Sounds like we should definitely bail them out. For many years, car companies in the US have not been producing fuel efficient cars, almost as if they were in league with gasoline companies and believed everyone would contine to be a douche and purchase a Hummer. According to fueleconomy.gov, a website I didn't make up, compact cars in 2000 were maxing out at 40 mpg on the highway, with many in the low- to mid-30s, while today, a car is touted as being "fuel efficient" if it can get 33 mpg on the highway. Even discounting the outliers, we've maybe gained 1 mpg in 8 years, tops.
It might be too late now for the car companies to turn things around. In a recent article in "Mother Jones", Ford said their car plants were not interchangeable; a plant designed to produce pickups could not be converted to make hybrids. Global economics work both ways. While corporations in America clamor to have market share, as well as factories, in other countries and pervade their culture, so too can Americans buy Japanese or European imports that are designed to not waste our money on gas. The "big three" car-makers have always been afraid of competition, however. In the early days of cars, when cable cars were still a viable public transportation option, some of the heads of car companies, using front corporations, purchased all the trolley lines and tore up the track. Their lobby was so powerful, they got the government to pay to pave roads and create highways, whereas the trolley and railroads paid for the tracks themselves.*
The "big three" would like $15 billion, in loans, so they can continue not making any real advancements in fuel efficiency and selling pieces of junk while moving factories and jobs overseas, all while the common man can't get a bailout or any financial relief. Corporations nowadays not only mistakenly have equal rights as people, they sometimes have more. This all dates back to when a court reporter defied his Chief Justice in a case involving railroad barons in the 1880s, and the memo the reporter wrote was basically turned into law and referred to in subequent trials, granting rights, rather than privileges, to corporations, but not other large groups of individuals (like unions, government, etc.). It's getting harder and harder not to get depressed.
*I think. In the interest of not being too misleading, I will admit I didn't research railroads or trolleys.
A couple of weeks ago, Yahoo reported the following: "General Motors Corp. said Friday it lost $2.5 billion in the third quarter and warned that it could run out of cash in 2009 if the U.S. economic slump continues and it doesn't get government aid." Aww, GM needs more money from the government so they can make more cars that nobody can afford, or so they can buy another company so they have more of a stranglehold on the car industry. Sounds like we should definitely bail them out. For many years, car companies in the US have not been producing fuel efficient cars, almost as if they were in league with gasoline companies and believed everyone would contine to be a douche and purchase a Hummer. According to fueleconomy.gov, a website I didn't make up, compact cars in 2000 were maxing out at 40 mpg on the highway, with many in the low- to mid-30s, while today, a car is touted as being "fuel efficient" if it can get 33 mpg on the highway. Even discounting the outliers, we've maybe gained 1 mpg in 8 years, tops.
It might be too late now for the car companies to turn things around. In a recent article in "Mother Jones", Ford said their car plants were not interchangeable; a plant designed to produce pickups could not be converted to make hybrids. Global economics work both ways. While corporations in America clamor to have market share, as well as factories, in other countries and pervade their culture, so too can Americans buy Japanese or European imports that are designed to not waste our money on gas. The "big three" car-makers have always been afraid of competition, however. In the early days of cars, when cable cars were still a viable public transportation option, some of the heads of car companies, using front corporations, purchased all the trolley lines and tore up the track. Their lobby was so powerful, they got the government to pay to pave roads and create highways, whereas the trolley and railroads paid for the tracks themselves.*
The "big three" would like $15 billion, in loans, so they can continue not making any real advancements in fuel efficiency and selling pieces of junk while moving factories and jobs overseas, all while the common man can't get a bailout or any financial relief. Corporations nowadays not only mistakenly have equal rights as people, they sometimes have more. This all dates back to when a court reporter defied his Chief Justice in a case involving railroad barons in the 1880s, and the memo the reporter wrote was basically turned into law and referred to in subequent trials, granting rights, rather than privileges, to corporations, but not other large groups of individuals (like unions, government, etc.). It's getting harder and harder not to get depressed.
*I think. In the interest of not being too misleading, I will admit I didn't research railroads or trolleys.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Whopper Virgin Suicides*
I've been reading a lot about those new Whopper Virgin ads from Burger King that have disgraced my TV screen and reinforced my constant praise of TiVo. Really, only two blogs, but I have seen two or three of the commercials on television. I find them mindless, pointless and a waste of my time, but not as offensive as most people or genius as some morons think they are. I'm against the complete globalization and white washing of the world's cultures through the infiltration of mass marketed big box stores and soulless chain fast food restaurants, sure. However, my beef, as it were, with the commercial lies in the blatant untruthfulness portrayed by showing people who had never had burgers or fast food taking bites of a McDonald's hamburger and a Burger King Whopper and then not running off to the bathroom with a bad case of explosive diarrhea. I demand truth in advertising!
*Get it? It's a play on words. Or a before-and-after, like from Jeopardy. Whopper Virgins, and [The] Virgin Suicides. Get it now? Ok, it wasn't that clever anyway.
*Get it? It's a play on words. Or a before-and-after, like from Jeopardy. Whopper Virgins, and [The] Virgin Suicides. Get it now? Ok, it wasn't that clever anyway.
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Heroes Pt 2: Days Of Evitable Future Past Apocalypse
Last time I wrote about Heroes, I mostly focused on the negative. That's gonna be true for this post as well, because nobody ever wants to read about positive thoughts, but this time I'll lead off with the good. Nobody wants to read my blog in general, but still. The point remains.
The villains are totally badass. I love Marlo's character, who gets stronger by feeding off of fear of anyone nearby, strong enough to punch a whole through the short-lived Magneto-like character. There was the guy who could emit sonic blasts, before Sylar killed his ass, the puppeteer guy, the Haitian's voodoo god-like brother, finally a speedster with Daphne, Bubs' (from the Wire) character who could produce black holes and was killed off too quickly, the guy who could turn his arm into metal, and finally, Arthur Petrelli, who showed Adam Monroe what being a bad guy was all about. "Welcome to Season 3 Adam. I know you were the main villain last season, but now, you're dead. Syonara."
Heroes needs to abandon it's playing with the future, because time travel always hurts my head, and it's almost always not done well, so when it's introduced to a show, the show suffers. Ahem, LOST. Having Hiro travel back to feudal Japan to help as well as become the legend he read about as a child was fun and funny, but also extremely paradoxical. Showing the dystopian future with an emotionless Claire and dead Peter who came back in time to shoot Nathan and give him a religious awakening that made little sense and seems to have vanished...damn I lost my point. Oh yea, STOP DOING IT! Peter's been to the future to see how bad it is how many times? And the future is never fully explained or makes sense. Speaking of not making sense, how did Arthur get back in time to steal the catalyst from Hiro, along with his power, last episode?*
However, my main beef with the show lies with Isaac Mendez. Not his prophetic paintings, which I sort of liked, and now that he's dead, those done by the African guy, who I sort of liked as well, until his head was separated from his body. Isaac's comic book, 9th Wonder, which has become a deux ex machina that doesn't even make any sense, and now his "last sketchbook," is what angers me. Ando, Hiro, Parkman and Daphne (nemesis, haha) don't know what to do next, so they check the comic book to see where to go next, which is written in the comic that they'll do, and they don't even think to check ahead a few pages to see if anything bad might happen. It makes the future immutable, but at the same time, they need to change it, because otherwise the world will end, and things seem to not be leading to the clips of the future we've seen, like Claire becoming cold as ice or Sylar becoming a family man, what with him burning Elle's corpse and all.
I also didn't like the trip back to the past to see how it all started, which gave me very little further appreciation for anyone or any relationships, except for Sylar, Elle and Noah Bennet. Why did they have to make Flint Gordon Claire's mom's brother? Isn't it enough that Nathan, a man given his flying powers through science, and her, a pyrotechnic, are Claire's parents and it doesn't make sense how she got her powers, whereas it does that Peter and Sylar both have slightly altered versions of Arthur's powers? Why do Flint and Meredith both have the same power as well, though he spits blue flame and she spits hot fire? Also, finding out that Arthur tried to kill Nathan, and then seeing Nathan find out and still run to Daddy's side in a later episode made me lose even more respect for him.
Again, don't get me wrong. I haven't missed any episodes of Heroes, except for the last minute and a half that TiVo keeps not recording. I think Hiro as a kid and loving waffles is hysterical, I get chills from Sylar, and I keep wondering which villains will come back or what will happen next. However, if they don't kill off Daphne, who has the shittiest villain story and her "romance" with Parkman is based off a dream he had of the future where he was in love with her, soon, get Peter his powers back and do something of consequence, I'm going to be mad and may even not watch. That is, until they get a character who has powers like Green Lantern.
*HD has since explained that Arthur stole Peter's powers, which included time travel. However, if Arthur can take away people's powers by touching them, including all the ones acquired, and Peter's power was to gain people's powers that he was in contact with, how come Peter didn't also have all of Sylar's powers? Ponder that, until your head explodes.
**By the way, I actually traveled into the future to watch the episode, then wrote it in the past, which is why the posting date is 12/9/2008, instead of 12/9/2020, when I watched the episode.
The villains are totally badass. I love Marlo's character, who gets stronger by feeding off of fear of anyone nearby, strong enough to punch a whole through the short-lived Magneto-like character. There was the guy who could emit sonic blasts, before Sylar killed his ass, the puppeteer guy, the Haitian's voodoo god-like brother, finally a speedster with Daphne, Bubs' (from the Wire) character who could produce black holes and was killed off too quickly, the guy who could turn his arm into metal, and finally, Arthur Petrelli, who showed Adam Monroe what being a bad guy was all about. "Welcome to Season 3 Adam. I know you were the main villain last season, but now, you're dead. Syonara."
Heroes needs to abandon it's playing with the future, because time travel always hurts my head, and it's almost always not done well, so when it's introduced to a show, the show suffers. Ahem, LOST. Having Hiro travel back to feudal Japan to help as well as become the legend he read about as a child was fun and funny, but also extremely paradoxical. Showing the dystopian future with an emotionless Claire and dead Peter who came back in time to shoot Nathan and give him a religious awakening that made little sense and seems to have vanished...damn I lost my point. Oh yea, STOP DOING IT! Peter's been to the future to see how bad it is how many times? And the future is never fully explained or makes sense. Speaking of not making sense, how did Arthur get back in time to steal the catalyst from Hiro, along with his power, last episode?*
However, my main beef with the show lies with Isaac Mendez. Not his prophetic paintings, which I sort of liked, and now that he's dead, those done by the African guy, who I sort of liked as well, until his head was separated from his body. Isaac's comic book, 9th Wonder, which has become a deux ex machina that doesn't even make any sense, and now his "last sketchbook," is what angers me. Ando, Hiro, Parkman and Daphne (nemesis, haha) don't know what to do next, so they check the comic book to see where to go next, which is written in the comic that they'll do, and they don't even think to check ahead a few pages to see if anything bad might happen. It makes the future immutable, but at the same time, they need to change it, because otherwise the world will end, and things seem to not be leading to the clips of the future we've seen, like Claire becoming cold as ice or Sylar becoming a family man, what with him burning Elle's corpse and all.
I also didn't like the trip back to the past to see how it all started, which gave me very little further appreciation for anyone or any relationships, except for Sylar, Elle and Noah Bennet. Why did they have to make Flint Gordon Claire's mom's brother? Isn't it enough that Nathan, a man given his flying powers through science, and her, a pyrotechnic, are Claire's parents and it doesn't make sense how she got her powers, whereas it does that Peter and Sylar both have slightly altered versions of Arthur's powers? Why do Flint and Meredith both have the same power as well, though he spits blue flame and she spits hot fire? Also, finding out that Arthur tried to kill Nathan, and then seeing Nathan find out and still run to Daddy's side in a later episode made me lose even more respect for him.
Again, don't get me wrong. I haven't missed any episodes of Heroes, except for the last minute and a half that TiVo keeps not recording. I think Hiro as a kid and loving waffles is hysterical, I get chills from Sylar, and I keep wondering which villains will come back or what will happen next. However, if they don't kill off Daphne, who has the shittiest villain story and her "romance" with Parkman is based off a dream he had of the future where he was in love with her, soon, get Peter his powers back and do something of consequence, I'm going to be mad and may even not watch. That is, until they get a character who has powers like Green Lantern.
*HD has since explained that Arthur stole Peter's powers, which included time travel. However, if Arthur can take away people's powers by touching them, including all the ones acquired, and Peter's power was to gain people's powers that he was in contact with, how come Peter didn't also have all of Sylar's powers? Ponder that, until your head explodes.
**By the way, I actually traveled into the future to watch the episode, then wrote it in the past, which is why the posting date is 12/9/2008, instead of 12/9/2020, when I watched the episode.
Monday, December 08, 2008
My Heroes Are My Mommy and Daddy
Heroes, Season 3, has been a roller-coaster ride so far. And by that, I don't mean nonstop thrill ride, I mean some episodes are good and some bottom out so fast, your stomach feels like it exited your body through your mouth. A quick disclaimer: I never thought Season 2 was as horrible as many people did, but I tend to just be happy when there's comic book characters anywhere.
I've really liked many of the new villains, but find Nathan ridiculously obnoxious and don't like new Nikki. In those two cases, at least, it seems like the characters have gone backwards. Nathan is back to being a whiny, wanna-be president lapdog to an evil and manipulating man, though this time it's his father instead of Linderman, and he keeps speaking in his worst fake Christian Bale Batman voice. In addition, he has one of the least useful powers on the show. Sure, everyone wants to fly, but as Senator of the US, he has access to jets and hot stewardesses. The only time his power was cool was when he flew into the Voodoo guy and knocked him into a car. That was pretty badass.
Getting back to motivations and regression, the same has been true of Hiro, Peter, Sylar, Angela Petrelli...hell, anyone connected, with insider knowledge. Either the character has become powerless or weak in some form (through erasing Hiro's mind and Peter losing his powers) to give the character an additional obstacle and doubt to overcome on his path to becoming a hero, or they've been left twisting in the wind, dealing with more lies and coverups than a Wolverine origins story, or they're still manipulating everyone and hiding the truth, despite that not having worked out well ever before. I've heard reasons, such as Peter was too powerful and needed to doubt and needed to be normal, which is maybe the same reason why Sylar lost his powers in Season 2.
Oh Sylar. Sylar. Sylar. Why can't they just pick a path for you and let you take it? They keep torturing you, changing their minds over whether you're hero, villian, or anti-hero, like when Venom went straight. Also, an episode before the stupid "Eclipse" arc, Sylar was able to gain someone's abilities just like Peter, without harming them. Was that just a fad, or did he only gain the powers when the persn was around, so killing them was needed for a long term solution? He's a great bad guy, but everyone knows there always needs to be a more evil bad guy, like Magneto and then Apocalypse, which often makes the first bad guy sort of good, if only for a little. I loved the episode where Sylar offered to make pancakes for Peter, despite it taking place in the future, and was pretty bummed out when Peter and Gabriel never mounted up and possed out on Arthur Petrelli's ass. That partnership had so much kick-ass potential.
Back to the negative on the Eclipse arc, this is how I imagine they sold it: "We're gonna change everything and kill off Sylar and Claire, but then everything will be back to normal as soon as the Eclipse is gone, because we wanted to shock people and have everyone worried about the eclipse, but we've already used the future many times to kill off people and the eclipse really wasn't as universe shattering as we may have led the public, so basically everything is status quo, yet again."
I've really liked many of the new villains, but find Nathan ridiculously obnoxious and don't like new Nikki. In those two cases, at least, it seems like the characters have gone backwards. Nathan is back to being a whiny, wanna-be president lapdog to an evil and manipulating man, though this time it's his father instead of Linderman, and he keeps speaking in his worst fake Christian Bale Batman voice. In addition, he has one of the least useful powers on the show. Sure, everyone wants to fly, but as Senator of the US, he has access to jets and hot stewardesses. The only time his power was cool was when he flew into the Voodoo guy and knocked him into a car. That was pretty badass.
Getting back to motivations and regression, the same has been true of Hiro, Peter, Sylar, Angela Petrelli...hell, anyone connected, with insider knowledge. Either the character has become powerless or weak in some form (through erasing Hiro's mind and Peter losing his powers) to give the character an additional obstacle and doubt to overcome on his path to becoming a hero, or they've been left twisting in the wind, dealing with more lies and coverups than a Wolverine origins story, or they're still manipulating everyone and hiding the truth, despite that not having worked out well ever before. I've heard reasons, such as Peter was too powerful and needed to doubt and needed to be normal, which is maybe the same reason why Sylar lost his powers in Season 2.
Oh Sylar. Sylar. Sylar. Why can't they just pick a path for you and let you take it? They keep torturing you, changing their minds over whether you're hero, villian, or anti-hero, like when Venom went straight. Also, an episode before the stupid "Eclipse" arc, Sylar was able to gain someone's abilities just like Peter, without harming them. Was that just a fad, or did he only gain the powers when the persn was around, so killing them was needed for a long term solution? He's a great bad guy, but everyone knows there always needs to be a more evil bad guy, like Magneto and then Apocalypse, which often makes the first bad guy sort of good, if only for a little. I loved the episode where Sylar offered to make pancakes for Peter, despite it taking place in the future, and was pretty bummed out when Peter and Gabriel never mounted up and possed out on Arthur Petrelli's ass. That partnership had so much kick-ass potential.
Back to the negative on the Eclipse arc, this is how I imagine they sold it: "We're gonna change everything and kill off Sylar and Claire, but then everything will be back to normal as soon as the Eclipse is gone, because we wanted to shock people and have everyone worried about the eclipse, but we've already used the future many times to kill off people and the eclipse really wasn't as universe shattering as we may have led the public, so basically everything is status quo, yet again."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
